We are Looking for Competition Judges!
Judge Applications are now being accepted. We will accept judge applications through 3 November 2016.
If you are ready to experience the joy of judging, we need your help.
- Competition information: https://competition.stcwdc.org/
- Call for Judges: https://competition.stcwdc.org/competition-call-for-judges/
- Judge Application form: https://competition.stcwdc.org/competition-judge-application-form/, please apply to judge by 3 November 2016.
- Schedule for Judges: https://competition.stcwdc.org/competition-schedule-for-judges/
- Competition Categories: https://competition.stcwdc.org/competition-categories/
Entries are arriving for the Washington, DC – Baltimore (WDCB) chapter's 2016 Summit Competition for Technical Communication. Would you like to see them? Are you ready to help evaluate them? If you think you may be, here's a brief summary of what's in store.
The Call for Entries in our technical communication competition was announced on 8 August. More announcements about the competition will appear in websites, blogs, tweets, and lists. The competition is coming together but we can not hold it successfully without the commitment of a group of qualified and enthusiastic judges. We recruit judges from among professional communicators in the Washington, DC and Baltimore metropolitan areas, and beyond. Membership in STC is not a requirement.
The deadline for entries is 28 October 2016. Between 28 October and 3 November, entries are logged and team judging assignments are made for each competition category. The entries are sorted into packages for each team on 3 November for the Entries Pick-Up and Judges' Training meeting.
On Saturday, 5 November, the judges assemble to receive their judging materials, entries, and instructions. They meet the other members of their judging team, get training from experienced judges on how to evaluate an entry, and have their questions answered.
Judging Teams and Consensus Judging
Over the next five weeks, judges read and examine their assigned entries. They discover—or rediscover—the joy of encountering excellence in published manuals, reports, training materials, journals, brochures, marketing and PR materials, magazines, help systems, websites, user support materials, and more. As they begin to form opinions and record their evaluations in the judging forms, the judges apply all the knowledge and experience at their disposal. They prepare their comments for the entrants and a defense of their decisions for the consensus meeting.
On Saturday, 3 December 2016, the judges meet again to discuss the entries and decide which ones deserve an award based on specified criteria. Entries are not judged against each other. Some entries stand out as award winners; others elicit debate. The judges relish the opportunity to compare notes on design, presentation of information, layout, and overall quality of an entry. When a judging team reaches a consensus about an entry, they assign an award level and nominate one or more of their Distinguished Technical Communication awardees for consideration as the Best of Show. The Best of Show judging team then selects the Best of Show and the Best Student Entry. Veteran and new judges leave the Consensus Meeting with a sense of a job well done. They have judged the work of their peers and shared their passion for excellence in communication. Many are eager to do it all over again in future years.